So anytime you find your EF model and/or class files out of sync with your database then you need to manually run the “Run Custom Tool” command on both the. So I selected the “Run Custom Tool” on the tt file:Īnd that generated the correct object model: So, I selected “Run Custom Tool” from the T4 context menu:īut I still didn’t have the Foo class in my object model: If you F4 the corresponding T4 file you can see that the custom tool associated with the T4 file is: TextTemplatingFileGenerator The most obvious choice is to select “Run Custom Tool” from the EDMX file, but that doesn’t do anything: But I discovered that there’s a context menu item called “Run Custom Tool”. Up until today I would have recreated the EDMX file, which is a big pain. I then go back to my app and add my new table to the model using the “Update Model from Database…” feature:īut the corresponding object model and CS file wasn’t generated: (The Update Model from Database option doesn’t update the object model and class files)įor example, let’s say I start with this model:Īnd I add a new table to the DB called Foo: The biggest beef I have with it is that the models can get out of sync with the database and saving the EDMX file and running the “Update Model from Database…” feature doesn’t work. Well, I should say it is awesome MOST of the time. I’ve been building apps for a really long time and have used all the frameworks that have come out over the years. Public bool isActive = ADO.NET Entity Framework is an awesome way to quickly pull data into an app. reference to the image of the Order = 5, TypeName = "varchar")] Instructions provided to the user about how to process the Order = 4, TypeName = "varchar(max)")] Link to BRCType Order = 3, TypeName = 1, IsUnique = false, IsClustered = false)] Identifier of the package that was delivered during the Order = 2, TypeName = 1, IsUnique = false, IsClustered = 1, IsUnique = true, IsClustered = false)] Unique identifier of the Order = 1, TypeName = 1, IsUnique = true, IsClustered = true)] #pragma warning disable 1591 // Ignore "Missing XML Comment" warning ReSharper disable RedundantOverridenMember ReSharper disable RedundantNameQualifier ReSharper disable PartialTypeWithSinglePart ReSharper disable PartialMethodWithSinglePart ReSharper disable DoNotCallOverridableMethodsInConstructor ReSharper disable ConvertPropertyToExpressionBody net core based, we will only use it to generate the templates and move the code into the existing project locations.Īgain not sure what the fluent gives you :p I dont see a problem with making a new project thats not. T4s seems to be the "easiest" way for now. Very basic things like just adding a new permission or navigation node are missing from the tool set unless you make a new entry. We have DBAs that generate our tables and use DevExtreme controls, seems like they spending a bunch of time on RadTools though instead of just writing some basic T4s. net core code, since at that point its just generating text. I modified the source code a little for our use cases, but Im looking at building out some T4 to do the same thing. Why do you need to use fluent design? There something specific you need that cant be done via the models? I would have to code the seeds differently and a few things but I have all that code in other projects so I am just wondering if the EF 6 and EF Core projects are somewhat interchangeable? So, my question is can we take the current version of the downloaded Angular project that uses the full framework and switch out to use the EF6 libraries and not the Core libraries. I know, that's not ideal, but this is a large client, with many years of technology in production. Plus, ABP system is merely one system in several so there are some database objects that really shouldn't be a part of this code base. So, we are creating several workarounds to get it to play nicely with ABP. Going from an existing database with varying degrees of standards across the tables (primary keys, audit columns) is difficult when coming from an existing database. I am really debating on going back to EF 6 simply to be able to use some T4 templates to generate code. It's possible but difficult to update the output of that process so we generate them up front, then all changes going forward are done code first.īut, back to my struggle. We generate them once because we have to change them to be ABP entities (Base Classes, Interfaces, etc). Just for reference if anyone wants to know, we are using this to generate entities (we only generate them once): I am actually going through this same process right now and it's a bit cumbersome.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |